The Issue with Arbitration Clauses

Updated on: November 24, 2025 | By The Champion Firm, Personal Injury Attorneys, P.C.
The Issue with Arbitration Clauses

Arbitration clauses in attorney-client fee contracts are bullsh*t.

Even some plaintiffs personal injury firms include arbitration clauses in their fee contracts with clients. Morgan & Morgan is one of them.

Morgan & Morgan requires its clients to arbitrate disputes that arise out of the attorney-client relationship, including any malpractice claims and fee disputes. In other words, if Morgan & Morgan is negligent and commits malpractice, the client has no right to go to court and have a jury decide the case. The client has to go to arbitration.

This is even though Morgan & Morgan attacks arbitration clauses on its own website. While making its own clients sign arbitration agreements, Morgan & Morgan says this about such agreements: “The reality is, these are corporate attempts to strip you of your Constitutional right to a trial by jury.”

If you're a trial lawyer, you should be fighting against arbitration clauses. You shouldn't be including them in your own fee contracts with your clients.

What does it say if you are a plaintiffs’ firm that should be fighting to uphold the 7th Amendment’s right to trial by jury, yet you require that your own clients contractually sign away that right when hiring you?

Join the conversation with me on LinkedIn here.